Our Sponsors

Home Amman News General
Syrians flee to Lebanon; death toll rises to 20 Print E-mail
Sunday, 26 June 2011 06:54

BEIRUT (AP) - Hundreds of Syrians, some with gunshot wounds, crossed into neighbouring Lebanon in search of a refuge from the growing government crackdown in their homeland, a Lebanese security official said Saturday. Other Syrians marched in a funeral for victims of the crackdown outside Damascus, demanding President Bashar Assad’s ouster.

Most refugees arriving at the Lebanese border came after Syrian security forces opened fire on protesters in anti-regime demonstrations across Syria on Friday. Syrian activists said 20 people were killed, including two children aged 12 and 13.

Most of those deaths occurred in the Barzeh neighbourhood of the capital, Damascus, and in the suburb of Al Kaswa. Footage posted online by activists showed dozens of people in a funeral procession for three of the dead in Al Kaswa Saturday, shouting “Allahu Akbar!” or “God is great!” and “Bashar, get out!”

The army sent reinforcements into Barzeh on Saturday, setting up checkpoints and arresting about 150 people, as well as into the suburbs of Al Kiswa, Zabadani and Bloudan, said Rami Abdul-Rahman of the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

Others had died Friday when security forces opened fire in the central city of Homs, sending residents fleeing to the Lebanese border 30 kilometres away.

The Syrian opposition says some 1,400 people have been killed as the government has cracked down on a movement demanding an end to four decades of autocratic Assad family rule - a popular uprising renewed each Friday after weekly Muslim prayers.

A prominent Syrian opposition figure, meanwhile, said some 200 regime critics and intellectuals will meet in Damascus on Monday to discuss strategies for a peaceful transition to democracy.

The one-day gathering will be the first such meeting of Damascus-based regime opponents, many of whom have long been persecuted by the Assad government.

Dissident Louay Hussein said Syrian authorities had not objected to the meeting. It will come one week after President Assad, in a nationally televised speech, spoke of convening his own national dialogue to discuss political reforms.

The activist Abdul-Rahman reported, meanwhile, that Syrian troops, backed by tanks, had entered yet another village, Al Najieh, near the border with Turkey, as part of their sweep against dissident centers in Idlib province.

The violence has prompted thousands of Syrians to seek a safe haven in neighbouring countries. Up to 1,000 crossed Friday and overnight into northern Lebanon’s Akkar region, near Wadi Khaled, a Lebanese security official said. Most crossed into the border village of Kneiseh from the Syrian village of Al Quseir, where Syrian activists said security forces fired on protesters Friday.

At least six Syrians with gunshot wounds were among the arrivals, the Lebanese official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with military regulations. The wounded were receiving treatment in Akkar hospitals.

The new arrivals join thousands of other Syrians who fled to Lebanon in May and early June, most during the Syrian military’s crackdown on the border town of Talkalakh, a few minutes’ walk from Lebanon’s Wadi Khaled.

Unlike the earlier exodus, when the displaced Syrians camped out on the Lebanese side of the border, many new arrivals were staying with relatives or elsewhere in Beirut, the Lebanese official said. He said some who crossed Friday returned early Saturday.

The military’s recent sweep through northwestern Syria, where armed resistance flared in early June, also has sent more than 11,700 refugees fleeing across the border to refugee camps in Turkey.

Syrian authorities have called on the refugees to return, after regaining control over the restive region in northern Syria’s Idlib province, but most have rejected the offer, fearing arrest or persecution upon return.

Turkey’s Anatolia news agency quoted the head of the Syrian Red Crescent, Abdul-Rahman Attar, as telling Turkish journalists in Damascus that his organisation wanted to visit the camps to speak to those who want to return to Syria.

He was quoted as saying his humanitarian organisation would guarantee that Syrian security agencies will leave returnees alone. “They will not be called to account,” he said.

One refugee on the Turkish side told the Associated Press he remained suspicious. “They want to see which of the families escaped and came here,” said this man, who wouldn’t give his name.

Hussein, a prominent Syrian writer and opposition figure, said Monday’s planned consultations by 200 regime opponents would take place under the slogan, “All for Syria within a civil and democratic state.”

Syrian authorities were informed of the meeting, but there would be no government representation, he told the AP.

“Three months into the protest movement and the government crackdown, the time is now ripe for such a meeting,” he said.

He said he hoped the fact the government was not blocking it reflects a will to allow some freedom of expression.

Whether such a meeting might produce partners for President Assad’s proposed “national dialogue” remains to be seen.

In his speech last Monday, Assad said he was forming a committee to study constitutional amendments, including one that would open the way to political parties other than the ruling Baath Party. He said a package of reforms was expected by September or no later than the end of the year.

Two days later, his foreign minister, Walid Mouallem, told reporters Damascus would soon present “an unprecedented example of democracy” in the troubled Middle East. He called for regime opponents to “to be a partner in shaping the future”.

Some prominent dissidents rejected such overtures, however, citing what they said was previous Assad talk of reform that produced no political change.

 
Gazans paid dearly for capturing Israeli Print E-mail
Sunday, 26 June 2011 06:53

GAZA CITY - Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have paid dearly over the five years since fighters captured a young Israeli soldier, Palestinian and Israeli analysts say.

But they also say Israel itself shoulders a “moral burden” in failing to free Gilad Shalit despite all its military might and diplomatic resources.

Shalit was 19 when he was captured in southern Israel on June 25, 2006 by fighters including members of the Islamist Hamas who staged a cross-border raid from the Gaza Strip. He has been held there ever since at a secret location.

In response to his abduction, Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza and then tightened it the following year.

It also arrested Hamas MPs in the West Bank and carried out deadly air strikes against the movement’s activists and premises in Gaza.

A devastating 22-day military offensive against Gaza, which ended in January 2009, was not directly attributed by Israel to the Shalit affair but rather to efforts to halt constant rocket fire from the enclave into southern Israel.

The operation claimed the lives of some 1,400 Palestinians - more than half civilians - and 13 Israelis, including 10 soldiers.

Walid Al Mudalal, a professor of history and political science at the Islamic University in Gaza, told AFP that the high price paid by residents of the coastal strip is “a part of resistance against the enemy”.

A fellow political scientist, Mukhaimar Abu Saadah of Gaza’s Al Azhar University, says that Israel used Shalit’s captivity as a pretext to impose “collective punishment, like the blockade, war, killing and injuring, demolishing and hampering reconciliation” between Hamas and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fateh movement.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came out strongly against a rapprochement between the former bitter rivals, telling Abbas to “tear it up”.

Mudalal says, however, that the Israeli government also faces “a moral burden and a political defeat” through its failure so far to return Shalit, to the anger of a broad Israeli consensus demanding his return.

A poll this week showed 63 per cent of Israelis in favour of meeting Hamas’ demand for the release of 1,000 Palestinians, including 450 with Israeli blood on their hands.

“It will be a moral and material gain for Hamas if the deal is closed, even though Israel will still be able to inflict collective punishment on Gaza,” Palestinian political analyst Talal Okal said.

Avi Issacharoff, an Israeli writer who covers Palestinian and Arab affairs for Haaretz newspaper, says that keeping Shalit captive for this long is “a success for Hamas and an obvious failure for the army and intelligence in Israel”.

But at the same time, he told AFP, failure to do the deal with Israel would constitute “a political failure for Hamas because of the thousands killed, injured and arrested, and political and economic failure”.

A Hamas statement marking the anniversary restated that Shalit would not be freed unless its demands were met in full.

“Shalit will not be freed without an honourable exchange deal,” Hamas official Ismail Radwan said. “There is no way [to release him] without responding to all the demands.”

Talks are deadlocked over Israel’s insistence that residents of the West Bank imprisoned for violence against Israelis will not be allowed to return to their homes, where they are close to Israel and to Jewish settlements. Instead, they must go to Gaza or an Arab state.

Issacharoff says the Israeli defence establishment views releasing hundreds of fighters into the West Bank as a “security nightmare” and that the government is unlikely to back down.

 
NATO missiles hit military targets in Brega Print E-mail
Sunday, 26 June 2011 06:52

TRIPOLI (Reuters) - NATO missiles have hit a site in Libya used by Muammar Qadhafi’s forces to stockpile military supplies and vehicles, the alliance said on Saturday, adding it was unaware of 15 civilian deaths reported by state media.

The attack late on Friday was the second within hours on what NATO said were clearly identified military targets in the coastal city of Brega, around 200km west of the rebel stronghold of Benghazi.

Libyan state television said a local bakery and a restaurant had been hit, wounding 20 people in addition to the 15 dead. State news agency Jana said a strike in the same area earlier on Friday had killed five civilians.

“We have no indications of any civilian casualties in connection to these strikes,” a NATO official said.

“What we know is that the buildings we hit were occupied and used by pro-Qadhafi forces to direct attacks against civilians around Ajdabiya,” the official said of a nearby rebel-held town.

“Unlike the pro-Qadhafi forces, we go to great lengths to reduce the possibility of any civilian casualties.”

Separately, a Reuters correspondent in the capital Tripoli heard a total of four loud explosions as jets flew overhead on two occasions on Saturday. The blasts appeared to come from the eastern suburb of Tajura. Several other explosions shook the city late on Friday.

NATO acknowledged for the first time last week that one of its raids in a three-month campaign could have caused civilian casualties, prompting concerns within the alliance.

Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said NATO’s credibility was at stake and called for a suspension in the campaign - an appeal that was swiftly knocked down at NATO headquarters and by allies, including France and Britain.

In a televised address this week, Qadhafi branded NATO “murderers” and vowed to fight to the death to stay in power.

The bombing campaign of the NATO-led coalition is into its fourth month in support of Libyan rebels seeking to end Qadhafi’s 41-year-old rule.

Recent progress has been slow and rebels have taken many casualties, but there are signs Qadhafi’s forces are also being stretched and the local economy hit by international sanctions.

 
Tripoli opposition waits for its moment Print E-mail
Sunday, 26 June 2011 06:51

TRIPOLI - Muammar Qadhafi’s fearsome security apparatus appears to be weakening in Tripoli, but it is still too powerful to risk an uprising - that is the view of Libyans who say they are part of a burgeoning underground opposition network in the capital.

The handful of activists, who spoke to Reuters journalists on condition that neither their identities nor the location of the meeting be revealed, said Qadhafi was keeping control of the city through informants, mass arrests and killings.

“No single event will bring down the regime here in Tripoli,” said one activist who goes by the name of Niz.

“And it will take time,” he added, saying more NATO bombing, a push by Libyan rebels outside the city and better coordination of the opposition inside the capital would probably be needed.

Yet Niz and others also spoke of a system of repression that was showing signs of strain, with a shortage of places to hold detainees, interrogators who do not know what questions to ask and people arrested and then released apparently at random.

That Reuters foreign journalists staying at a tightly monitored hotel were able to slip away from government minders to meet people who said they represented active opposition cells was itself a sign of disarray in the decades-old security system - a disarray NATO is counting to bring Qadhafi down eventually.

Four activists from two different opposition movements - groups which have maintained contact with foreign media for the past few months - gave an account of what they thought it would take for Qadhafi’s grip on his Tripoli stronghold to be broken.

It was an assessment that will be sobering for those in Western capitals, and in the rebel-held Libyan cities of Benghazi and Misrata, who have been hoping for a swift end to the four-month old conflict.

An uprising in Tripoli is seen by some NATO member states as the best bet for toppling the Libyan ruler after months of coalition air strikes, and rebel attacks outside the capital, failed to produce a decisive outcome.

“The rebels don’t really have a chance of breaking out from the east, making their way to Tripoli,” said Shashank Joshi of the Royal United Services Institute in London. “It will rely on some sort of urban uprising within the city itself.”

Niz said outsiders, and the eastern rebels, should be patient if they were waiting for Tripolitanians to rise up:

“Four months is a long time for those being shelled,” he said of those under siege in Misrata and elsewhere. “It’s a long time for those being raped or tortured,” he added.

“But, objectively, it’s not a long time when you consider the regime has been in power for 42 years.”

Varied group

Niz has been in regular contact with foreign media, speaking for what he calls the Free Generation Movement - predominantly secular, young and liberal in outlook, inspired by the uprisings that overthrew autocrats in neighbouring Tunisia and Egypt.

Quite how many people Niz speaks for is unclear. It may be as few as a dozen people in regular contact with each other in a city deprived of most modern communications beyond basic phone services. But each such group appears to have contacts with many others, suggesting loose, cellular pattern of opposition action.

Those activists Reuters met said an uprising in the capital would require further weakening of Qadhafi’s rule by the NATO bombing campaign, significant progress towards the capital by rebels - and a stronger opposition network within the city.

Building up that network has been made vastly more difficult by the government’s decision to shut down Internet and mobile phone text messages. That has deprived Qadhafi’s opponents of access to tools that played a big role in Egypt and Tunisia.

“We’re having to do things the old-fashioned way,” said one of the activists, who used the name Fatima. “That takes time.”

Her group, going by the name of the February 17 Young Women’s Coalition of Tripoli - a reference to the date of the first big street protests - also appears tiny, but also representative of widespread anti-Qadhafi sentiment.

Many dozens of people in Tripoli who have spoken to Reuters discreetly in the past four months echo such views, especially their ultimate goal of ending Qadhafi’s 42-year rule.

As a group, the activists Reuters met at a secret location in the city were all well-educated. All four had university degrees and spoke English. Ranging in age from their 20s to middle-age, the women wore Islamic headscarves, the men casual Western-style dress of jeans and T-shirts.

Mass arrests

Qadhafi’s opponents in Tripoli live in fear of arrest. Setting up a meeting between them and Reuters reporters involved elaborate preliminary arrangements by the activists to make sure Qadhafi’s intelligence services did not find out about it.

At the meeting, the youngsters who presented themselves as active in an underground opposition network described heavy security across the city, especially at night with numerous checkpoints that shift locations from day to day.

People can be held for anything from hours to days, or even weeks; some have been killed, the activists said. “There are mass arrests every day. There are killings every day,” said Niz.

They said some people appeared to have been arrested solely on the grounds of being originally from rebel towns, such as Misrata or Zlitan. At other times, arrests seemed to be based on people’s family names. In Libya, these often carry clues about local origins or tribal connections.

Often though, the detentions seem to be pretty much random. “There are no rules,” said an activist from the women’s coalition who used the name Amal. “Just what they decide.”

Libyan officials deny repressing dissidents, and say the overwhelming majority of the population supports Qadhafi. They describe those who do not as criminals and Al Qaeda militants. Rival accounts cannot be independently verified as the government keeps the small international media corps largely confined to a hotel and rarely lets reporters out without an official escort. Groups like Human Rights Watch have reported accounts of mass arrests and torture of dissidents in Tripoli.

Lawless city

Though still powerful, the security apparatus is showing signs of strain, the activists said. Levels of crime seem to have risen on the streets of Tripoli, especially at night, apparently since security men are so focused on preserving Qadhafi’s rule they have limited capacity for routine policing.

Civilian loyalists of Qadhafi have been armed by the government and sent out to help in the crackdown on dissent are themselves robbing residents, one of the activists alleged.

“The volunteers took the guns not because they believe in Qadhafi but because they wanted the power,” Amal said. “They have taken their chance to make as much money as possible.

“And they are enjoying their power.”

Everything from minor infractions such as running a red light or talking on a mobile phone while driving - officially subject to a 500-dinar ($400) fine - to public drunkenness in a country where alcohol is banned, is now possible without real fear of falling foul of the police, the activists said.

“It’s jungle law out there,” said Niz. “There is no law now. There is just the protection of the regime.”

The activists said Qadhafi’s security services appeared to have become fragmented, to have lost numbers to defections and some interrogation facilities to the NATO bombing campaign.

“Some people are sent to interrogators who have no idea what to ask them,” said Salim, a Free Generation Movement activist. “Some people are arrested who have done many things to get in trouble but are released without interrogation, while others who have done nothing are kept for weeks.”

“There is no pattern,” he said.

“Some people are released within hours, others are held for days and tortured. Others do not show up again.”

Salim described what he called signs of paranoia on the part of some security men - for example, sending “six cars to arrest someone when before they would send only two”.

But activists said a heavy-handed response to calls for reform, the widespread use of informants and shutdown of social media websites, were proving effective in combating opposition - many people were still too afraid to speak out.

“There are plenty of people, including soldiers, who are anti-Qadhafi,” said Amal. “But they can’t show it yet because they are afraid.

“They are waiting for the rebels to get closer so that the fighting can be over quickly instead of lasting months.”

As an example of why it is too early to expect an uprising in the Libyan capital, the activists cited rumours ahead of June 17, the four-month anniversary of the uprising, that the rebels had some sort of action planned in Tripoli. But when June 17 arrived, last Friday, security was so heavy that there were armed men waiting outside mosques after weekly prayers.

“When the uprising comes it will be spontaneous,” said Niz.

“A pre-planned event will be impossible because the regime will be prepared for it. It would be suicide.”

 
Iran, Iraq to shut down Camp Ashraf - Talabani Print E-mail
Sunday, 26 June 2011 06:50

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iran and Iraq have formed a joint committee with the Red Cross to shut down Camp Ashraf in Iraq which houses thousands of outlawed Iranian opponents, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said on Saturday.

"The camp will be shut down by the end of this year," Talabani said on the sidelines of a counterterrorism summit in Tehran, the official IRNA news agency reported.

"For this, a tripartite committee has been set up by Iraq, Iran and the International Red Cross to make decisions and follow up on necessary measures to shut down the camp of this terrorist group," IRNA quoted him as saying.

The People's Mujahedeen established Camp Ashraf in the 1980s - when now-executed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's regime was at war with Iran - as a base from which to launch military action against the Islamic republic.

Camp Ashraf, is now home to some 3,400 people.

The People's Mujahedeen, which describes itself as both left-wing and Islamic, opposed the shah of Iran and now seeks to oust the clerical regime that took power in Tehran in the 1979 revolution.

Iranian intelligence minister Heydar Moslehi said the Mujahedeen was on the verge of "collapse", and added that his agencies were taking "measures" to speed up the process, the Mehr news agency reported.

"On this issue, [the intelligence apparatus] have had discussions with officials in Iraq to resolve the future of the camp Ashraf as soon as possible," Moslehi said, also speaking on the sidelines of the summit.

But he also extended an olive branch to Mujahedeen members who part ways with the group.

"Islamic leniency awaits those members of this terrorist group who leave it or escape Camp Ashraf and return to the arms of the Islamic republic of Iran's regime," Moslehi said.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshiyar Zebari had proposed during a Tuesday visit to Tehran the formation of a tripartite committee to "resolve the issues of Camp Ashraf".

"We have asked international organisations and European parliaments to encourage the [group's] members to leave Iraq, and to facilitate [the movement of] those members who seek to go those countries," Zebari said.

The announcement was met with a "vigorous" condemnation by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the broad grouping that includes the People's Mujahedeen.

The NCRI said allowing Iran to "interfere in the issue of Ashraf is a red line that should not be crossed," and urged the International Committee of the Red Cross "not to lose credibility by participating in this plan of repression."

"The UN and the US government must take responsibility to protect the unarmed and defenceless people at Ashraf, and they will be held responsible for any attack that will target them," the NCRI warned in a statement.

Camp Ashraf has become a mounting problem for the Iraqi authorities since US forces transferred security for the camp in January 2009, and amid pressure from Tehran to hand over the members of the militant group.

On April 8, Iraqi security forces carried out a deadly raid on the camp, killing 34 members of the group.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 9 of 55